wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/edit-ed.md

# Editing files via scripts with ed

![](keywords>bash shell scripting arguments file editor edit ed sed)

## Why ed?

Like `sed`, `ed` is a line editor. However, if you try to change file
contents with `sed`, and the file is open elsewhere and read by some
process, you will find out that GNU `sed` and its `-i` option will not
allow you to edit the file. There are circumstances where you may need
that, e.g. editing active and open files, the lack of GNU, or other
`sed`, with "in-place" option available.

Why `ed`?

- maybe your `sed` doesn't support in-place edit
- maybe you need to be as portable as possible
- maybe you need to really edit in-file (and not create a new file like
  GNU `sed`)
- last but not least: standard `ed` has very good editing and addressing
  possibilities, compared to standard `sed`

Don't get me wrong, this is **not** meant as anti-`sed` article! It's
just meant to show you another way to do the job.

## Commanding ed

Since `ed` is an interactive text editor, it reads and executes commands
that come from `stdin`. There are several ways to feed our commands to
ed:

**<u>Pipelines</u>**

    echo '<ED-COMMANDS>' | ed <FILE>

To inject the needed newlines, etc. it may be easier to use the builtin
command, `printf` ("help printf"). Shown here as an example Bash
function to prefix text to file content:


    # insertHead "$text" "$file"

    insertHead() {
      printf '%s\n' H 1i "$1" . w | ed -s "$2"
    }

**<u>Here-strings</u>**

    ed <FILE> <<< '<ED-COMMANDS>'

**<u>Here-documents</u>**

    ed <FILE> <<EOF
    <ED-COMMANDS>
    EOF

Which one you prefer is your choice. I will use the here-strings, since
it looks best here IMHO.

There are other ways to provide input to `ed`. For example, process
substitution. But these should be enough for daily needs.

Since `ed` wants commands separated by newlines, I'll use a special Bash
quoting method, the C-like strings `$'TEXT'`, as it can interpret a set
of various escape sequences and special characters. I'll use the `-s`
option to make it less verbose.

## The basic interface

Check the `ed` manpage for details

Similar to `vi` or `vim`, `ed` has a "command mode" and an "interactive
mode". For non-interactive use, the command mode is the usual choice.

Commands to `ed` have a simple and regular structure: zero, one, or two
addresses followed by a single-character command, possibly followed by
parameters to that command. These addresses specify one or more lines in
the text buffer. Every command that requires addresses has default
addresses, so the addresses can often be omitted.

The line addressing is relative to the *current line*. If the edit
buffer is not empty, the initial value for the *current line* shall be
the last line in the edit buffer, otherwise zero. Generally, the
*current line* is the last line affected by a command. All addresses can
only address single lines, not blocks of lines!

Line addresses or commands using *regular expressions* interpret POSIX
Basic Regular Expressions (BRE). A null BRE is used to reference the
most recently used BRE. Since `ed` addressing is only for single lines,
no RE can ever match a newline.

## Debugging your ed scripts

By default, `ed` is not very talkative and will simply print a "?" when
an error occurs. Interactively you can use the `h` command to get a
short message explaining the last error. You can also turn on a mode
that makes `ed` automatically print this message with the `H` command.
It is a good idea to always add this command at the beginning of your ed
scripts:

    bash > ed -s file <<< $'H\n,df'
    ?
    script, line 2: Invalid command suffix

While working on your script, you might make errors and destroy your
file, you might be tempted to try your script doing something like:

    # Works, but there is better

    # copy my original file
    cp file file.test

    # try my script on the file
    ed -s file.test <<< $'H\n<ed commands>\nw'

    # see the results
    cat file.test

There is a much better way though, you can use the ed command `p` to
print the file, now your testing would look like:

    ed -s file <<< $'H\n<ed commands>\n,p'

the `,` (comma) in front of the `p` command is a shortcut for `1,$`
which defines an address range for the first to the last line, `,p` thus
means print the whole file, after it has been modified. When your script
runs sucessfully, you only have to replace the `,p` by a `w`.

Of course, even if the file is not modified by the `p` command, **it's
always a good idea to have a backup copy!**

## Editing your files

Most of these things can be done with `sed`. But there are also things
that can't be done in `sed` or can only be done with very complex code.

### Simple word substitutions

Like `sed`, `ed` also knows the common `s/FROM/TO/` command, and it can
also take line-addresses. **If no substitution is made on the addressed
lines, it's considered an error.**

#### Substitutions through the whole file

    ed -s test.txt <<< $',s/Windows(R)-compatible/POSIX-conform/g\nw'

<u>Note:</u> The comma as single address operator is an alias for `1,$`
("all lines").

#### Substitutions in specific lines

On a line containing `fruits`, do the substitution:

    ed -s test.txt <<< $'/fruits/s/apple/banana/g\nw'

On the 5th line after the line containing `fruits`, do the substitution:

    ed -s test.txt <<< $'/fruits/+5s/apple/banana/g\nw'

### Block operations

#### Delete a block of text

The simple one is a well-known (by position) block of text:

    # delete lines number 2 to 4 (2, 3, 4)
    ed -s test.txt <<< $'2,5d\nw'

This deletes all lines matching a specific regular expression:

    # delete all lines matching foobar
    ed -s test.txt <<< $'g/foobar/d\nw'

g/regexp/ applies the command following it to all the lines matching the
regexp

#### Move a block of text

...using the `m` command: `<ADDRESS> m <TARGET-ADDRESS>`

This is definitely something that can't be done easily with sed.

    # moving lines 5-9 to the end of the file
    ed -s test.txt <<< $'5,9m$\nw'

    # moving lines 5-9 to line 3
    ed -s test.txt <<< $'5,9m3\nw'

#### Copy a block of text

...using the `t` command: `<ADDRESS> t <TARGET-ADDRESS>`

You use the `t` command just like you use the `m` (move) command.

    # make a copy of lines 5-9 and place it at the end of the file
    ed -s test.txt <<< $'5,9t$\nw'

    # make a copy of lines 5-9 and place it at line 3
    ed -s test.txt <<< $'5,9t3\nw'

#### Join all lines

...but leave the final newline intact. This is done by an extra command:
`j` (join).

    ed -s file <<< $'1,$j\nw'

Compared with two other methods (using `tr` or `sed`), you don't have to
delete all newlines and manually add one at the end.

### File operations

#### Insert another file

How do you insert another file? As with `sed`, you use the `r` (read)
command. That inserts another file at the line before the last line (and
prints the result to stdout - `,p`):

    ed -s FILE1 <<< $'$-1 r FILE2\n,p'

To compare, here's a possible `sed` solution which must use Bash
arithmetic and the external program `wc`:

    sed "$(($(wc -l < FILE1)-1))r FILE2" FILE1

    # UPDATE here's one which uses GNU sed's "e" parameter for the s-command
    #   it executes the commands found in pattern space. I'll take that as a
    #   security risk, but well, sometimes GNU > security, you know...
    sed '${h;s/.*/cat FILE2/e;G}' FILE1

Another approach, in two invocations of sed, that avoids the use of
external commands completely:

    sed $'${s/$/\\n-||-/;r FILE2\n}' FILE1 | sed '0,/-||-/{//!h;N;//D};$G'

## Pitfalls

### ed is not sed

ed and sed might look similar, but the same command(s) might act
differently:

**\_\_ /foo/d \_\_**

In sed /foo/d will delete all lines matching foo, in ed the commands are
not repeated on each line so this command will search the next line
matching foo and delete it. If you want to delete all lines matching
foo, or do a subsitution on all lines matching foo you have to tell ed
about it with the g (global) command:

    echo $'1\n1\n3' > file

    #replace all lines matching 1 by "replacement"
    ed -s file <<< $'g/1/s/1/replacement/\n,p' 

    #replace the first line matching 1 by "replacement"
    #(because it starts searching from the last line)
    ed -s file <<< $'s/1/replacement/\n,p'

**\_\_ an error stops the script \_\_**

You might think that it's not a problem and that the same thing happens
with sed and you're right, with the exception that if ed does not find a
pattern it's an error, while sed just continues with the next line. For
instance, let's say that you want to change foo to bar on the first line
of the file and add something after the next line, ed will stop if it
cannot find foo on the first line, sed will continue.

    #Gnu sed version
    sed -e '1s/foo/bar/' -e '$a\something' file

    #First ed version, does nothing if foo is not found on the first line:
    ed -s file <<< $'H\n1s/foo/bar/\na\nsomething\n.\nw'

If you want the same behaviour you can use g/foo/ to trick ed. g/foo/
will apply the command on all lines matching foo, thus the substitution
will succeed and ed will not produce an error when foo is not found:

    #Second version will add the line with "something" even if foo is not found
    ed -s file <<< $'H\n1g/foo/s/foo/bar/\na\nsomething\n.\nw'

In fact, even a substitution that fails after a g/ / command does not
seem to cause an error, i.e. you can use a trick like g/./s/foo/bar/ to
attempt the substitution on all non blank lines

### here documents

**\_\_ shell parameters are expanded \_\_**

If you don't quote the delimiter, \$ has a special meaning. This sounds
obvious but it's easy to forget this fact when you use addresses like
\$-1 or commands like \$a. Either quote the \$ or the delimiter:

    #fails
    ed -s file << EOF
    $a
    last line
    .
    w
    EOF 

    #ok
    ed -s file << EOF
    \$a
    last line
    .
    w
    EOF 

    #ok again
    ed -s file << 'EOF'
    $a
    last line
    .
    w
    EOF 

**\_\_ "." is not a command \_\_**

The . used to terminate the command "a" must be the only thing on the
line. take care if you indent the commands:

    #ed doesn't care about the spaces before the commands, but the . must be the only thing on the line:
    ed -s file << EOF
        a
    my content
    .
        w
    EOF

## Simulate other commands

Keep in mind that in all the examples below, the entire file will be
read into memory.

### A simple grep

    ed -s file <<< 'g/foo/p'

    # equivalent
    ed -s file <<< 'g/foo/'

The name `grep` is derived from the notaion `g/RE/p` (global =\> regular
expression =\> print). ref
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/G/grep.html>

### wc -l

Since the default for the `ed` "print line number" command is the last
line, a simple `=` (equal sign) will print this line number and thus the
number of lines of the file:

    ed -s file <<< '='

### cat

Yea, it's a joke...

    ed -s file <<< $',p'

...but a similar thing to `cat` showing line-endings and escapes can be
done with the `list` command (l):

    ed -s file <<< $',l'

FIXME to be continued

## Links

Reference:

- [Gnu ed](http://www.gnu.org/software/ed/manual/ed_manual.html) - if we
  had to guess, you're probably using this one.
- POSIX
  [ed](http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ed.html#tag_20_38),
  [ex](http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ex.html#tag_20_40),
  and
  [vi](http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/vi.html#tag_20_152)
- <http://sdf.lonestar.org/index.cgi?tutorials/ed> - ed cheatsheet on
  sdf.org

Misc info / tutorials:

- [How can I replace a string with another string in a variable, a
  stream, a file, or in all the files in a
  directory?](http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/021) - BashFAQ