12 KiB
Small getopts tutorial
![](keywords>bash shell scripting arguments positional parameters options getopt getopts)
Description
Note that getopts
is neither able to parse GNU-style long options
(--myoption
) nor XF86-style long options (-myoption
). So, when you
want to parse command line arguments in a professional ;-) way,
getopts
may or may not work for you. Unlike its older brother getopt
(note the missing s!), it's a shell builtin command. The advantages
are:
- No need to pass the positional parameters through to an external program.
- Being a builtin,
getopts
can set shell variables to use for parsing (impossible for an external process!) - There's no need to argue with several
getopt
implementations which had buggy concepts in the past (whitespace, ...) getopts
is defined in POSIX(r).
Some other methods to parse positional parameters - using neither getopt nor getopts - are described in: How to handle positional parameters.
Terminology
It's useful to know what we're talking about here, so let's see... Consider the following command line:
mybackup -x -f /etc/mybackup.conf -r ./foo.txt ./bar.txt
These are all positional parameters, but they can be divided into several logical groups:
-x
is an option (aka flag or switch). It consists of a dash (-
) followed by one character.-f
is also an option, but this option has an associated option argument (an argument to the option-f
):/etc/mybackup.conf
. The option argument is usually the argument following the option itself, but that isn't mandatory. Joining the option and option argument into a single argument-f/etc/mybackup.conf
is valid.-r
depends on the configuration. In this example,-r
doesn't take arguments so it's a standalone option like-x
../foo.txt
and./bar.txt
are remaining arguments without any associated options. These are often used as mass-arguments. For example, the filenames specified forcp(1)
, or arguments that don't need an option to be recognized because of the intended behavior of the program. POSIX(r) calls them operands.
To give you an idea about why getopts
is useful, The above command
line is equivalent to:
mybackup -xrf /etc/mybackup.conf ./foo.txt ./bar.txt
which is complex to parse without the help of getopts
.
The option flags can be upper- and lowercase characters, or digits. It may recognize other characters, but that's not recommended (usability and maybe problems with special characters).
How it works
In general you need to call getopts
several times. Each time it will
use the next positional parameter and a possible argument, if parsable,
and provide it to you. getopts
will not change the set of positional
parameters. If you want to shift them, it must be done manually:
shift $((OPTIND-1))
# now do something with $@
Since getopts
sets an exit status of FALSE when there's nothing
left to parse, it's easy to use in a while-loop:
while getopts ...; do
...
done
getopts
will parse options and their possible arguments. It will stop
parsing on the first non-option argument (a string that doesn't begin
with a hyphen (-
) that isn't an argument for any option in front of
it). It will also stop parsing when it sees the --
(double-hyphen),
which means end of options.
Used variables
variable description
OPTIND Holds the index to the next argument to be processed. This is how getopts
"remembers" its own status between invocations. Also useful to shift the positional parameters after processing with getopts
. OPTIND
is initially set to 1, and needs to be re-set to 1 if you want to parse anything again with getopts
OPTARG This variable is set to any argument for an option found by getopts
. It also contains the option flag of an unknown option.
OPTERR (Values 0 or 1) Indicates if Bash should display error messages generated by the getopts
builtin. The value is initialized to 1 on every shell startup - so be sure to always set it to 0 if you don't want to see annoying messages! OPTERR
is not specified by POSIX for the getopts
builtin utility --- only for the C getopt()
function in unistd.h
(opterr
). OPTERR
is bash-specific and not supported by shells such as ksh93, mksh, zsh, or dash.
getopts
also uses these variables for error reporting (they're set to
value-combinations which arent possible in normal operation).
Specify what you want
The base-syntax for getopts
is:
getopts OPTSTRING VARNAME [ARGS...]
where:
OPTSTRING
tells getopts
which options to expect and where to expect arguments (see below)
VARNAME
tells getopts
which shell-variable to use for option reporting
ARGS
tells getopts
to parse these optional words instead of the positional parameters
The option-string
The option-string tells getopts
which options to expect and which of
them must have an argument. The syntax is very simple --- every option
character is simply named as is, this example-string would tell
getopts
to look for -f
, -A
and -x
:
getopts fAx VARNAME
When you want getopts
to expect an argument for an option, just place
a :
(colon) after the proper option flag. If you want -A
to expect
an argument (i.e. to become -A SOMETHING
) just do:
getopts fA:x VARNAME
If the very first character of the option-string is a :
(colon),
which would normally be nonsense because there's no option letter
preceding it, getopts
switches to "silent error reporting mode".
In productive scripts, this is usually what you want because it allows
you to handle errors yourself without being disturbed by annoying
messages.
Custom arguments to parse
The getopts
utility parses the positional
parameters of the current shell or function by
default (which means it parses "$@"
).
You can give your own set of arguments to the utility to parse. Whenever
additional arguments are given after the VARNAME
parameter, getopts
doesn't try to parse the positional parameters, but these given words.
This way, you are able to parse any option set you like, here for example from an array:
while getopts :f:h opt "${MY_OWN_SET[@]}"; do
...
done
A call to getopts
without these additional arguments is
equivalent to explicitly calling it with "$@"
:
getopts ... "$@"
Error Reporting
Regarding error-reporting, there are two modes getopts
can run in:
- verbose mode
- silent mode
For productive scripts I recommend to use the silent mode, since everything looks more professional, when you don't see annoying standard messages. Also it's easier to handle, since the failure cases are indicated in an easier way.
Verbose Mode
invalid option VARNAME
is set to ?
(question-mark) and OPTARG
is unset
required argument not found VARNAME
is set to ?
(question-mark), OPTARG
is unset and an error message is printed
Silent Mode
invalid option VARNAME
is set to ?
(question-mark) and OPTARG
is set to the (invalid) option character
required argument not found VARNAME
is set to :
(colon) and OPTARG
contains the option-character in question
Using it
A first example
Enough said - action!
Let's play with a very simple case: only one option (-a
) expected,
without any arguments. Also we disable the verbose error handling by
preceding the whole option string with a colon (:
):
#!/bin/bash
while getopts ":a" opt; do
case $opt in
a)
echo "-a was triggered!" >&2
;;
\?)
echo "Invalid option: -$OPTARG" >&2
;;
esac
done
I put that into a file named go_test.sh
, which is the name you'll see
below in the examples.
Let's do some tests:
Calling it without any arguments
$ ./go_test.sh
$
Nothing happened? Right. getopts
didn't see any valid or invalid
options (letters preceded by a dash), so it wasn't triggered.
Calling it with non-option arguments
$ ./go_test.sh /etc/passwd
$
Again --- nothing happened. The very same case: getopts
didn't
see any valid or invalid options (letters preceded by a dash), so it
wasn't triggered.
The arguments given to your script are of course accessible as $1
-
${N}
.
Calling it with option-arguments
Now let's trigger getopts
: Provide options.
First, an invalid one:
$ ./go_test.sh -b
Invalid option: -b
$
As expected, getopts
didn't accept this option and acted like told
above: It placed ?
into $opt
and the invalid option character (b
)
into $OPTARG
. With our case
statement, we were able to detect this.
Now, a valid one (-a
):
$ ./go_test.sh -a
-a was triggered!
$
You see, the detection works perfectly. The a
was put into the
variable $opt
for our case statement.
Of course it's possible to mix valid and invalid options when calling:
$ ./go_test.sh -a -x -b -c
-a was triggered!
Invalid option: -x
Invalid option: -b
Invalid option: -c
$
Finally, it's of course possible, to give our option multiple times:
$ ./go_test.sh -a -a -a -a
-a was triggered!
-a was triggered!
-a was triggered!
-a was triggered!
$
The last examples lead us to some points you may consider:
- invalid options don't stop the processing: If you want to stop
the script, you have to do it yourself (
exit
in the right place) - multiple identical options are possible: If you want to disallow these, you have to check manually (e.g. by setting a variable or so)
An option with argument
Let's extend our example from above. Just a little bit:
-a
now takes an argument- on an error, the parsing exits with
exit 1
#!/bin/bash
while getopts ":a:" opt; do
case $opt in
a)
echo "-a was triggered, Parameter: $OPTARG" >&2
;;
\?)
echo "Invalid option: -$OPTARG" >&2
exit 1
;;
:)
echo "Option -$OPTARG requires an argument." >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
Let's do the very same tests we did in the last example:
Calling it without any arguments
$ ./go_test.sh
$
As above, nothing happened. It wasn't triggered.
Calling it with non-option arguments
$ ./go_test.sh /etc/passwd
$
The very same case: It wasn't triggered.
Calling it with option-arguments
Invalid option:
$ ./go_test.sh -b
Invalid option: -b
$
As expected, as above, getopts
didn't accept this option and acted
like programmed.
Valid option, but without the mandatory argument:
$ ./go_test.sh -a
Option -a requires an argument.
$
The option was okay, but there is an argument missing.
Let's provide the argument:
$ ./go_test.sh -a /etc/passwd
-a was triggered, Parameter: /etc/passwd
$
See also
- Internal: posparams
- Internal: case
- Internal: while_loop
- POSIX getopts(1) and getopt(3)
- parse CLI ARGV
- handle command-line arguments (options) to a script