wiki.bash-hackers.org/commands/builtin/echo.md

89 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2023-04-16 10:04:24 +02:00
# The echo builtin command
## Synopsis
echo [-neE] [arg ...]
## Description
`echo` outputs it's args to stdout, separated by spaces, followed by a
newline. The return status is always `0`. If the
[shopt](/commands/builtin/shopt) option `xpg_echo` is set, Bash
dynamically determines whether echo should expand escape characters
(listed below) by default based on the current platform. `echo` doesn't
interpret `--` as the end of options, and will simply print this string
if given.
### Options
| Option | Description |
|:-------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `-n` | The trailing newline is suppressed. |
| `-e` | Interpretation of the following backslash-escaped characters (below) is enabled. |
| `-E` | Disables the interpretation of these escape characters, even on systems where they are interpreted by default. |
### Escape sequences
| Escape | Description |
|:-------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `\a` | alert (bell) |
| `\b` | backspace |
| `\c` | suppress further output |
| `\e` | |
| `\E` | an escape character |
| `\f` | form feed |
| `\n` | new line |
| `\r` | carriage return |
| `\t` | horizontal tab |
| `\v` | vertical tab |
| `\\` | backslash |
| `\0nnn` | the eight-bit character whose value is the octal value nnn (zero to three octal digits) |
| `\xHH` | the eight-bit character whose value is the hexadecimal value HH (one or two hex digits) |
| `\uHHHH` | the Unicode (ISO/IEC 10646) character whose value is the hexadecimal value HHHH (one to four hex digits) |
| `\UHHHHHHHH` | the Unicode (ISO/IEC 10646) character whose value is the hexadecimal value HHHHHHHH (one to eight hex digits) |
## Examples
## Portability considerations
- `echo` is a portability train wreck. No major shell follows POSIX
completely, and any shell that attempts to do so should be considered
horribly broken.
[SUSv4](http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/echo.html#tag_20_37)
specifies that `echo` **shall not** include any options. Further, it
specifies that the behavior of `-n` as a first argument shall be
determined by the implementation, unless XSI is followed, in which
case `-n` is always treated as a string, and backslash escapes are
interpreted by default. `dash` has the misfeature of following this
and interpreting escapes by default, but includes a `-n` feature for
suppressing newlines nevertheless.
In practice, if you're able to assume a korn-like shell including
bash, mksh, or zsh, `echo` when used in simple cases is generally
reliable. For example, in the very common situation in which echo is
supplied with a single argument and whose output is to have a newline
appended, using `echo` is considered common practice.
<!-- -->
- **Never use options to `echo`! *Ever*!** Any time you feel tempted to
use `echo -e`, `-n`, or any other special feature of echo, **use
[printf](/commands/builtin/printf) instead!** If portability is a
requirement, you should consider using `printf` *exclusively* and just
ignore that `echo` even exists. If you must use `echo -e` and refuse
to use `printf`, it is usually acceptable to use ''echo \$'...' ''if
targeting only shells that support this special quoting style.
<!-- -->
- `ksh93` has a `print` command, which if coding specifically for
`ksh93` should be preferred over `echo`.
[printf](/commands/builtin/printf) still includes most of the
functionality of both, and should usually be the most preferred
option.
## See also
- [printf](/commands/builtin/printf)
- <http://cfajohnson.com/shell/cus-faq.html#Q0b>