mirror of
https://github.com/flokoe/bash-hackers-wiki.git
synced 2024-11-01 14:53:06 +01:00
120 lines
5.3 KiB
Plaintext
120 lines
5.3 KiB
Plaintext
|
====== The case statement ======
|
||
|
|
||
|
===== Synopsis =====
|
||
|
<code>
|
||
|
case <WORD> in
|
||
|
[(] <PATTERN1> ) <LIST1> ;; # or ;& or ;;& in Bash 4
|
||
|
[(] <PATTERN2> ) <LIST2> ;;
|
||
|
[(] <PATTERN3> | <PATTERN4> ) <LIST3-4> ;;
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
[(] <PATTERNn>) <LISTn> [;;]
|
||
|
esac
|
||
|
</code>
|
||
|
|
||
|
===== Description =====
|
||
|
The ''case''-statement can execute commands based on a [[syntax:pattern | pattern matching]] decision. The word ''<WORD>'' is matched against every pattern ''<PATTERNn>'' and on a match, the associated [[syntax:basicgrammar#lists | list]] ''<LISTn>'' is executed. Every commandlist is terminated by ''<nowiki>;;</nowiki>''. This rule is optional for the very last commandlist (i.e., you can omit the ''<nowiki>;;</nowiki>'' before the ''esac''). Every ''<PATTERNn>'' is separated from it's associated ''<LISTn>'' by a '')'', and is optionally preceded by a ''(''.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bash 4 introduces two new action terminators. The classic behavior using '';;'' is to execute only the list associated with the first matching pattern, then break out of the ''case'' block. The '';&'' terminator causes ''case'' to also execute the next block without testing its pattern. The '';;&'' operator is like '';;'', except the case statement doesn't terminate after executing the associated list - Bash just continues testing the next pattern as though the previous pattern didn't match. Using these terminators, a ''case'' statement can be configured to test against all patterns, or to share code between blocks, for example.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The word ''<WORD>'' is expanded using //tilde//, //parameter// and //variable expansion//; //arithmetic//, //command// and //process substitution//; and //quote removal//. **No word splitting, brace, or pathname expansion is done**, which means you can leave expansions unquoted without problems:
|
||
|
<code>
|
||
|
var="test word"
|
||
|
|
||
|
case $var in
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
esac
|
||
|
</code>
|
||
|
This is similar to the behavior of the [[syntax:ccmd:conditional_expression | conditional expression command ("new test command")]] (also no word splitting for expansions).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Unlike the C-case-statement, only the matching list and nothing else is executed. If more patterns match the word, only the first match is taken. (**Note** the comment about Bash v4 changes above.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Multiple ''|''-delimited patterns can be specified for a single block. This is a POSIX-compatable equivalent to the ''@(pattern-list)'' extglob construct.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The ''case'' statement is one of the most difficult commands to indent clearly, and people frequently ask about the most "correct" style. Just do your best - there are many variations of indenting style for ''case'' and no real agreed-upon best practice.
|
||
|
|
||
|
===== Examples =====
|
||
|
Another one of my stupid examples...
|
||
|
<code>
|
||
|
printf '%s ' 'Which fruit do you like most?'
|
||
|
read -${BASH_VERSION+e}r fruit
|
||
|
|
||
|
case $fruit in
|
||
|
apple)
|
||
|
echo 'Mmmmh... I like those!'
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
banana)
|
||
|
echo 'Hm, a bit awry, no?'
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
orange|tangerine)
|
||
|
echo $'Eeeks! I don\'t like those!\nGo away!'
|
||
|
exit 1
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
*)
|
||
|
echo "Unknown fruit - sure it isn't toxic?"
|
||
|
esac
|
||
|
</code>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here's a practical example showing a common pattern involving a ''case'' statement. If the first argument is one of a valid set of alternatives, then perform some sysfs operations under Linux to control a video card's power profile. Otherwise, show a usage synopsis, and print the current power profile and GPU temperature.
|
||
|
<code bash>
|
||
|
# Set radeon power management
|
||
|
function clk {
|
||
|
typeset base=/sys/class/drm/card0/device
|
||
|
[[ -r ${base}/hwmon/hwmon0/temp1_input && -r ${base}/power_profile ]] || return 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
case $1 in
|
||
|
low|high|default)
|
||
|
printf '%s\n' "temp: $(<${base}/hwmon/hwmon0/temp1_input)C" "old profile: $(<${base}/power_profile)"
|
||
|
echo "$1" >${base}/power_profile
|
||
|
echo "new profile: $(<${base}/power_profile)"
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
*)
|
||
|
echo "Usage: $FUNCNAME [ low | high | default ]"
|
||
|
printf '%s\n' "temp: $(<${base}/hwmon/hwmon0/temp1_input)C" "current profile: $(<${base}/power_profile)"
|
||
|
esac
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
</code>
|
||
|
|
||
|
A template for experiments with ''case'' logic, showing shared code between blocks using '';&'', and the non-short-circuiting '';;&'' operator:
|
||
|
<code bash>
|
||
|
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||
|
|
||
|
f() {
|
||
|
local -a "$@"
|
||
|
local x
|
||
|
|
||
|
for x; do
|
||
|
case $x in
|
||
|
$1)
|
||
|
local "$x"'+=(1)' ;;&
|
||
|
$2)
|
||
|
local "$x"'+=(2)' ;&
|
||
|
$3)
|
||
|
local "$x"'+=(3)' ;;
|
||
|
$1|$2)
|
||
|
local "$x"'+=(4)'
|
||
|
esac
|
||
|
IFS=, local -a "$x"'=("${x}: ${'"$x"'[*]}")'
|
||
|
done
|
||
|
|
||
|
for x; do
|
||
|
echo "${!x}"
|
||
|
done
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
f a b c
|
||
|
|
||
|
# output:
|
||
|
# a: 1,4
|
||
|
# b: 2,3
|
||
|
# c: 3
|
||
|
</code>
|
||
|
|
||
|
===== Portability considerations =====
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Only the '';;'' delimiter is specified by POSIX.
|
||
|
* zsh and mksh use the '';|'' control operator instead of Bash's '';;&''. Mksh has '';;&'' for Bash compatability (undocumented).
|
||
|
* ksh93 has the '';&'' operator, but no '';;&'' or equivalent.
|
||
|
* ksh93, mksh, zsh, and posh support a historical syntax where open and close braces may be used in place of ''in'' and ''esac'': ''case word { x) ...; };''. This is similar to the alternate form Bash supports for its [[syntax/ccmd/classic_for | for loops]], but Bash doesn't support this syntax for ''case..esac''.
|
||
|
===== See also =====
|
||
|
* [[http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_09_04_05|POSIX case conditional construct]]
|